Concrete Peace
The horrific sectarian cleansing of much of Baghdad in 2006-2007 separated the warring parities. As a consequence of the surge, the sectarian cleansing slowed and has now basically stopped. It is not "complete" in the sense that there are still some Sunni neighborhoods (mostly in western Baghdad) and a few (somewhat) mixed areas elsewhere, but Baghdad has become a city of enclaves. Beyond the U.S. troop increase, the greater emphasis on population security, and the recruitment of local Sons of Iraq to patrol neighborhoods and man checkpoints, there is another ingredient to the fragile, Balkanized peace in Iraq's capital: concrete. Baghdad could now be called "The City of Walls."
Baghdad hasn't been this quiet in years. But the respite from bloodshed comes at a high price.Up to 20 feet high in some sections.
Rows after rows of barrier walls divide the city into smaller and smaller areas that protect people from bombings, sniper fire and kidnappings. They also lead to gridlock, rising prices for food and homes, and complaints about living in what feels like a prison.
Baghdad's walls are everywhere, turning a riverside capital of leafy neighborhoods and palm-lined boulevards where Shiites and Sunnis once mingled into a city of shadows separating the two Muslim sects.
The walls block access to schools, mosques, churches, hotels, homes, markets and even entire neighborhoods — almost anything that could be attacked. For many Iraqis, they have become the iconic symbol of the war. . . .
Indeed, new walls are still going up, the latest one around the northwestern Shiite neighborhood of Hurriyah, where thousands of Sunnis were slaughtered or expelled in 2006. They could well be around for years to come, enforcing Iraq's fragile peace and enshrining the capital's sectarian divisions. . . .
First introduced by the Americans in 2003 to protect their Green Zone headquarters, walls became much more widespread with the launch early last year of a major security campaign in Baghdad. In some walled-off neighborhoods, access was granted only on proof of residence or special ID cards.
Nowadays there's hardly a street in Baghdad without a wall — or a cheaper substitute like barbed wire, palm tree trunks, mounds of dirt or piles of rocks. They're even used to control pedestrian and vehicular traffic in risky areas.
A core principle of COIN is separating the population from insurgents and monitoring and controlling access points to prevent reinfiltration. Walls, berms, and other barriers all serve that purpose. In Baghdad, the security benefits of walls are obvious. But we should not forget that the very need for the walls is an indictment of the failure to provide genuine population security in Baghdad through other means much earlier. And we shouldn't forget the very real, very human downside to these barriers: one person's secure "gated community" is another person's prison.
Some walls are colorful, painted by young local artists with scenes depicting green pastures or the pomp and glory of Iraq's ancient civilizations.
Others are commercial, plastered with fliers advertising everything from the local kebab joint to seaside vacations in Iran or university degrees in Ukraine.
Still others are religious or political, with posters of popular clerics or graffiti hostile to the United States, Israel or — most recently — Iraq's prime minister.
Most are just bleak and gray, a reminder that danger lurks on the other side.
Dora, a one-time stronghold of Sunni insurgents in southern Baghdad, has so many walls and observation towers that some parts resemble a maze.
The district's notorious Moalimeen area, which until a year ago had been among the most dangerous places in the capital, is now accessible to pedestrians through revolving iron doors guarded by security troops.
"The walls have stopped gunmen from coming into the neighborhood," said Salim Ahmed, a 29-year-old oil refinery worker who lives and works in Dora. "But we also feel that we are in a prison and isolated from the rest of the city." . . .
In April, the U.S. military sealed off the southern section of Sadr City to put the American Embassy and Iraqi government offices out of range of rockets and mortars fired by Shiite militiamen.
The shelling has since stopped, and quick-thinking entrepreneurs rushed to lay claim to a spot against the wall to sell fruits and vegetables.
Because of the Sadr City wall, Mustapha's journey to work every day now involves a 15-minute walk and two minibus rides — a major inconvenience considering Baghdad's unforgiving summer heat.
"It's both annoying and useful," Mustapha said. "It makes us feel like prisoners, but things have calmed down since they built it."
17 comments:
A wall worked in Cyprus. Still is working. It's not a perfect world.
The walls are just a sign of the continuing sectarian divide in Iraq. What I think is more important is how the government deals with the return of refugees. From what I've read Baghdad went from a Sunni majority to a Shiite one during the sectarian war period. Slowly Iraqis are trying to go back home assisted by local neighborhood councils set up by the US. Maliki on the other hand is doing little to nothing. The UN just complained that Iraq had given peanuts to neighboring countries to take care of Iraqi refugees despite promises of more by Maliki. The UN said other countries aren't willing to cone through with more aid until they feel that Iraq cares. More importantly the Ministry in charge of the displaced is believed to be sectarian and doesn't help Sunnis. That basically means it's up to each neighborhood to take care of itself. Not really the ideal way to take care of 4 million odd refugees.
forgot to say that I can't see the Shiite powers letting go of Baghdad and having it revert back to a Sunni majority. That probably means the walls will be a fixture in the Capitol as the distrust continues.
Well, at least the walls have reduced sectarian violence - much the way a lock down stops a prison riot, except that the various gangs are locked into their own neighborhoods and out of the others. It would however, be a mistake to claim that the sectarian issue has been solved in part to this solution, as it would be a mistake to believe prisoners have been rehabilitated as a result of the lock down. The problem is that the walls, not only further segregate various groups from contact with each other, but also prohibit any normal economic/commercial functions from taking place. A city like Baghdad cannot ever recover/reconstruct and function economically as long as it remains a warren of cantons. Whats worse though, is that the deconstruction of the walls could just as likely to be politically volatile as their construction, with some neighborhoods becoming much more like prisons, while others are liberated.
In the end, this idea is just another hybrid variant on destroying the village in order to save it.
anna missed
In middle 2006 my Brigade Commander started to build walls in Dora. In late Summer 2006 I built a wall around Ameriyah with one checkpoint leading into the district. In both cases the walls helped to reduce violence. In Ameriyah we put the thing up with the original intent of trying to make it more difficult for sunni-insurgents to move stuff into and out of the district to the west. But very quickly it became clear that the residents generally liked it because it protected them from shia attack from their south. As a note of sad irony, while building the wall helped to protect the sunnis of Ameriyah from shia death squads and actually caused many sunnis threatened from other areas in Baghdad to move there because they perceived it to be safer, the sad irony was that by increasing security for sunnis in Ameriyah at the same time it made the place just down right lethal for the remaining shia. By increasing security for sunnis, it gave them more freedom of movement in the district to hunt down and kill shia. How does a tactical battalion commander try to affect that?
On a different note, docIrack is right to point out that population security through control is a key tenet of FM 3-24. But I also suggest that the walls of Baghdad may suggest the limits to the coin doctrine contained in FM 3-24. That is to say the concept behind walls is that you use them to seperate the insurgents fromt the people and through that process of seperation the people once protected from the insurgents will gravitate back to what is supposed to be a legitimate government. But if the Iraq war is more than one over the control of the people by a legitimate government against the insurgents, if it is a sectrarian one, a tribal one, etc, then the efficacy of walls and what they will lead to are highly problematic.
I am intrigued by Anon's analogous quip that the walls are a "hybrid variant" of destroying the village to save it.
Or to look at it another way, while in the short run they reduce violence, in the long run they are helping to harden and not soften the sides in this most complex and violent civil war.
Or to look at it another way, while in the short run they reduce violence, in the long run they are helping to harden and not soften the sides in this most complex and violent civil war.
I don't know how you can say that with certainty. The truth or falsity of your statement depends ultimately on the character of the Iraqi people.
The US military did not cause the Sunni-Shia schism or Kurdish-Arab animosities, both of which predate the existence of the USA. If walls give the people time to work things out, "shouting instead of shooting" as it were, that seems like a very good thing.
If the walls result in partition I do not see a problem either. I have never understood or supported the Bush admin position against partition. It seems like imperialism to take that position. I think the US policy should be that whether Iraq stays united or not is a decision the Iraqi people should make in a peaceful manner.
I have never understood why US policy would be officially against a partition of Iraq into three or mroe countries.
Buck Smith:
I dont say it with certainty and I hope I am wrong, but I may be right. It is without doubt hard to know.
Time will tell.
gg
buck,
public opinion surveys of Iraqis consistently show that they are opposed to dividing up the country.
The last major poll was released in March 2008 by ABC, BBC and NHK and found that 66% supported "One unified Iraq with a central government in Baghdad," 23% "A group of regional states with their own regional governments and a federal government in Baghdad." No responses were given for whether they wanted Iraq divided up into separate countries.
The older surveys did apparently ask that question and found that in August 2007 only 9% supported it, 9% in Feb. 07, 14% in 2005, 9% in 2004, 4% in 2003.
Support for federalism was 28% in Aug. 07, 28% in Feb. 07, 18% in 2005, 14% in 2004.
IF the Iraqi gov't refuses to deal w/ returning refugees, what about the BAGHDAD Mayor? What's his stance on this? Does he want to re-integrate the refugees? Does he care? Or is he a Dawa/SCIRI partisan?
public opinion surveys of Iraqis consistently show that they are opposed to dividing up the country.
That's fine, my point is the US government should not take an opinion on this matter. If the Iraqis don't want to divide their country, maybe that means they are capable of stopping killing each other. Or maybe this level of violence is going to be normal for Iraq. I believe the murder rate in Iraq is now below South Africa, often cited as a model post-colonial democracy.
Motown
"From what I've read Baghdad went from a Sunni majority to a Shiite one during the sectarian war period. "
The oft-proclaimed Sunni Arab "majority" in Baghdad was exposed as a myth by the constitutional referendum vote in Oct 5 when the Sunnis were barely able to muster 22/23% for the "No" vote.
Confirmed by the Dec 05 election, when the Sunni Arab parties again polled around 20/21%.
The shia were a substantial majority in Baghdad before the ferocious ethnic cleansing broke out.
OK RFC: solve the refugee/displaced person problem:
Open the FOB's, and most of the Green Zone. Move the Iraqi's in. Start with health and education infrastructure, and build into housing. I'm serious. Green Zone, and CP Victory first.
I thought it was a good idea then, and still do.
Await comments.
Hard to predict the long-term effect of these walls... They built "peace walls" in Northern Ireland and Belfast to separate Catholics and Protestants. Ten years after the signing of the Good Friday agreement that brought peace to the area, these walls remain. Some want them taken down, but many do not. In fact new “peace walls” continue to be erected…"
Some links at http://ph2dot1.blogspot.com/2008/05/peace-walls.html or do a Google search on "peace walls"
I'm for it elf,
Especially considering the refugees are in large part professional class and more likely to be secular/liberal in political outlook - its just the right sort of influence and expertise that is missing from the equation. From everything I've read on the matter, there is zero sectarian animosity among the refugees living in foreign countries - so re-importing that sensibility would be a good thing indeed.
anna missed
Anna,
Glad we have common ground.
Maybe people smarter than me know the answer, but I still don't know why we are taking up huge swaths of prime real estate (much of which is empty, BTW).
Peace out
Fools and bairns should not see unfinished work.
The walls will come down when people get annoyed enough at the inconvenience and that's the biggest worry on their plate.
runescape money runescape gold tibia item tibia gold runescape accounts tibia money runescape gp buy runescape gold tibia gold tibia item buy runescape money runescape items tibia money
Post a Comment