Monday, June 2, 2008

A Better Life and Rising Expectations in Basra

After a ragged start, a fierce fight, and a truce brokered by Iran, the Iraqi Army re-took Basra. In the ensuing weeks, a city of fear has been replaced by the initial signs of hope. People are on the streets, lovers stroll in public without fear of being targeted, more women feel free to discard their headscarves (if they want too), and music can be heard again. Iraqi Army and police checkpoints dot the city to provide security, Sadr offices have been taken over, his posters have been trashed, and his militia has faded away. Maliki's popularity is on the rise.

Fact or fiction? A little of both.

A good piece in the WaPo today details this renaissance:

Two months after the Iraqi government ordered its fledgling military to root out the religious militias here in Iraq's third-largest city, Basra is beginning to awaken from a four-year dormancy. A recent week-long visit that included several dozen interviews revealed that many of the city's nearly 3 million residents are resuming lives that had been interrupted by an austere interpretation of Islam.

But a few caveats should be noted:

But their new freedom in this historically cosmopolitan city near the head of the Persian Gulf comes with boundaries drawn by fear of the future. The root cause of their previous grievances -- well-armed militias fighting for power and economic resources -- continue to exert influence over day-to-day life.

Conservative Shiite religious parties, backed by these militias, still control government ministries. Security is brittle, ushered in by a temporary deployment of 30,000 Iraqi soldiers and expedient political cease-fire agreements. Corruption as well as a lack of basic public services, jobs and investment are deepening frustrations.

[. . .]

Basra's transformation is far from uniform, unfolding mostly on the surface.

It is still extremely rare to see women, even Christians, on the streets without a head scarf. Many women wear the black, head-to-toe abaya, either out of conservatism or fear.

"We're still cautious," Fatima said. "Anything can still happen."

On Al Jazaar Street, the city's most popular commercial district, Dhiya Jassim cranked up the 3,000-watt speakers in his DVD store, blasting a song by Egyptian pop star Amru Diab. The walls were covered with Western DVDs, many with sexually explicit scenes that would have drawn the ire of the extremists.

His dream is to open an arcade shop with sophisticated computer games, once forbidden.

"I am nervous that the black days could return," he said. "We're still afraid to start any big projects."

Samer Riad, 23, an artist, is still reluctant to paint portraits of women, another practice outlawed by the fundamentalists.

"I have canceled this idea from my mind," he said. He continues to draw portraits of shanasheels, the wooden grills that cover many balconies here, from which women can look without being seen by the world outside.

"I will not be restricted by anything, if this lasts," said Riad, referring to the security improvements.

In 2005, extremists ordered Mohammed, a plastic surgeon, to shut down his practice. "You are changing what God had created," he recalled them telling him. He refused -- at first.

Four times, he said, militiamen linked to a religious faction in the Basra government tried to assassinate him. They also destroyed $80,000 worth of surgical equipment during a rampage through his office. He fled to Syria, returning last year.

But he has no plan to reopen his practice.

"The government is still the same," said Mohammed, who asked that his full name not be used because he feared for his life.

Thus, in Basra, hope and fear, optimism and distrust co-mingle. Much of the news out of Basra is good, and, if the Iraqi Army and police can hold neighborhoods and prevent reinfiltration by JAM, it provides an opportunity for the Iraqi government to consolidate gains . . . if the Iraqi government seizes it.

The key will be to move toward improved governance--fast. When security is scarce, as it was in Basra for so long, that is what people prioritize and most desire. As security improves, however, people start shifting their hierarchy of needs and desires toward "quality of life" issues: jobs, entrepreneurial opportunities, health care, education, electricity, water, sewage, trash pick-up, etc. They also become less tolerant of local corruption. In other words, their expectations for a better life and for better governance rapidly increase. This is a sign of progress, but also creates its own dangerous dynamics if government performance doesn't keep pace with expectations. This race against rising expectations is a race to consolidate stability and government legitimacy. This is the heart of the "build" portion of clear-hold-build, and it must be done well before frustrations become so pronounced that people are tempted, once again, to turn to alternatives to the state (i.e., militias, Iranian patrons) that offer a competitive system of governance.

(For more on Basra, see here and this excellent photo gallery here.)

22 comments:

Cada Guaraguao su Pitirre tiene said...

I almost fell out of my chair when I read the latest analysis by Immanuel Wallerstein about Iraq:

Currently, the United States is trying to get Iraq to sign a long-term military accord that would guarantee U.S. bases indefinitely. The current prime minister of Iraq, Nouri al-Maliki, is trying to maneuver this without a vote even by parliament. Muqtada al-Sadr is calling for a referendum. And so, it seems, is al-Sistani. A referendum, of course, guarantees a defeat for the accord. So, in 2009, it would seem logical that al-Sadr, al-Sistani, the Sunni, and even the Kurds will come together on a plank of national unity and U.S. total withdrawal without long-term bases. Muqtada al-Sadr will implement this as Prime Minister. Al-Hakim will be unhappy, but kept in line by al-Sistani. The Iranians will be ambivalent. The U.S. public and pundits will be amazed at the relative calm in Iraq. And President Obama and the Pentagon won't have too much choice. They will graciously assent. They may even proclaim "victory."

Sound plausible?

Dr. iRack said...

No. The coalition Wallerstein proposes is implausible. The Kurds want the Americans to stay. Ditto for a growing number of Sunnis (including the Anbar sheiks and the IIS). And Maliki and Hakim are positioning Da'wa and ISCI to crowd out the Sadrists in upcoming elections--and these 2 Shia parties also want some kind of long-term U.S. relationship.

There may be a substantial U.S. withdrawal in the next year or so, but it won't be through this scenario.

motown67 said...

"sound plausible?"

No. Sadr's not going to become Prime Minister. For most of the second half of 2007 the Sadrists in parliament tried to work with various parties to bring down Maliki and they failed. Sadr is wounded after the operations in Basra and Sadr City, so it's even less likely to happen now. Also, I would assume the Kurds would welcome a continued U.S. presence because even though they've grown mad at the White House lately over the PKK and Turkey, they still see the U.S. as a guarantor of their security.

Cada Guaraguao su Pitirre tiene said...

I didn't think you would buy it. To be honest, neither do I (at least not all of it).

I tend to agree with this bit:

Once in office, Obama will no doubt find that the definition of withdrawing troops will be a matter of great controversy in the United States, and that it will be less easy than he claims to achieve his objective, were it a matter only of the internal politics of the United States. However, ending the war in Iraq will not be up to Obama, or up to the United States. The key to ending the war in Iraq is what happens in Iraqi politics, not in U.S. politics.

elf2006real said...

To pose a question on Basra; does anyone know if SF is in there doing what they are actually supposed to be doing*, and is it even possible for us to tie in some civil affairs types (doing actual civil affairs) and maybe even some NGO and PRT types?

Or was there something in my chai when I had that thought?

*as opposed to raids.

elf2006real said...

I think my above point being; now is a good time to build goodwill by providing and rebuilding those very basic services.

I don't see the GoI or the IA being in a position to do much other than offer security.

Dr. iRack said...

Uh, up above I meant IIP--don't even know what IIS would be. Damn keyboards!

elf2006real, I don't know but that is a great question.

sweden1975 said...

Dr. iRack 6:50 PM,

Bravo bravo, correct surmised in my opinion. Your piece about Basra was also good. So different from before! I loved the photo of the girls outside the store. I have forgotten who it was that said that the small business class was destroyed in Iraq! Whoever it was didn't know much about human nature. :)) As I always have said it will be the women who will be the downfall of the Muslims.

I had plans to go to Morroco this summer, but I think I change my mind and take my vacation in Basra instead. I have no fear for a country where I can see the Music conservatories is busy teaching interested students.
 

sweden1975 said...

 
Is it true that it is charter from London? I would be obliged if someone could inform me, That would suit me fine, I can take Ryanair from Stockholm and then directly to Basra. Are the busses from the airport? As I said I appreciate all help.
 

motown67 said...

elf,

At the beginning of April Maliki sent some of his advisors to Basra saying they were going to work to improve basic services. A few days later he said that the government would spend $100 mil. on the city and hoped to create 25,000 jobs.

I think right now Iraqi forces are still clearing the city of criminals and Sadrists. They've pretty much gone through the major Sadrist neighborhoods and also cleared out gangs from the waterway, and arrested some Fadhila and Thar Allah members as well.

I wouldn't expect any real improvement in services for a while because the Iraqi government is so bad at that right now. They don't have the staff to implement their current budget, many of those working aren't competent, there's plenty of corruption, and there's some basic disconect between Baghdad and the provinces.

The Iraqi military might be able to carry out small scale operations like was reported in Sadr City. There they handed out aid packages of food and clothing (that happened to be put together by the Americans), as well as set up some health check spots, but I haven't read anything specifically about Basra.

elf2006real said...

Motown67,

Thanks.

sweden1975 said...
This post has been removed by the author.
sweden1975 said...

 
How much of a tip are you expected to give at a semi-fashionable restaurant in Basra?

?

Sam Jones said...

Dr. Irack -- seems like the news out of Basra, as you say, is positive, but that there are some risks. Why then, is your post mostly focused on the risks and not on the positive, i.e. in proportion to the developments over the last few weeks?

Dr. iRack said...

Sam,

Thanks for the comment.

First, I think the post is fairly balanced, but I guess that is open to interpetation.

Second, because the history of this war is littered with examples where emphasizing the happy side of events led to complacency in addressing the very real risks and challenges, it's probably better to err on the side of pointing to remaining challenges that must be taken seriously. No?

fnord said...

And on the doom-and-gloom note: If the Mahdi army has faded away into the shadows, where are those shadows? Is this a Basra-center only development, or part of a larger trend in the south? How are the other urban centers of the south, or the rural countryside? snli?

Sam Jones said...

Dr. Irack -- thanks for your reply. My post was meant in part in relation to the rumble that broke out over the supposed "bias" of the AM blog a few posts ago. I certainly agree with you about earlier problems emphasizing happy things and I know you just want the best for the US and US forces.

How about this -- what is your prediction for the course of events in Basra over the next 2-3 months? Improvements or backsliding?

Dr. iRack said...

My magic 8 ball predicts possible resurfacing of JAM and violence in the lead-up to the provincial elections. The offensive in Basra was partly about cracking down on militias and criminality, but ALSO was a Da'wa/ISCI shaping operation for the fall elections. All sides want to win badly. And all sides are armed. So strife could loom on the horizon UNLESS the government capitalizes on the months in between to address lingering security concerns and economic grievances.

Hope I'm wrong.

David M said...

The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the blog post From the Front: 06/03/2008 News and Personal dispatches from the front lines.

motown67 said...

Right now it appears the Sadrists are hunkering down and many are getting arrested. When Maliki launched his operation against Basra, Sadrists rose up across the south and Baghdad. I think Karbala they were mostly peaceful, but in the rest of the major cities except for Hilla they were rounded up and killed. Hilla was the only southern city where it appeared the Sadrists were repulsing and actually gaining ground against Iraqi forces. Since then the government forces have continued to arrest Sadrists, especially in Basra, now including Sadr City.

I think much of JAM has actually been destroyed or sacattered. People always cite the number of 60,000 fighters, but that was at their high point during the sectarian war of 2006-2007 when there were plenty of hangers on and other elements joining them, especially in Baghdad. I don't think they have close to that many anymore.

motown67 said...

"How about this -- what is your prediction for the course of events in Basra over the next 2-3 months? Improvements or backsliding?"

On the good side, improvement in trade and business through the port. Perhaps a big offer from a foreign country to invest in the harbor and make much needed improvements to the port's infrastructure. Also more personal freedoms for individuals now that militias are off the streets. Decline in crime with a sense of law and order with so many government forces on the streets, plus perhaps a drop in oil smuggling.

Bad - government services don't improve, militias perhaps laying low. Definitely conflict come fall/winter when elections are to be held.

Status quo - Basra was divided up into different fiefs controlled by different Shiite parties/militias such as Fadhila, Sadrists, SIIC, Hezbollah, Thar Allah, some smaller parties. Some of these areas have been cleared by Iraqi forces but they're still under the sway of the Shiite parties.

When the Basra operations began I thought Maliki would only go after the Sadrists. I was encouraged by the fact that they also went after Fadhila and Thar Allah. There was a report on NPR recently that said security forces opened up a large and popular swimming pool to the public that before only SIIC members were allowed to use. That shows some signs of evenhandedness.

What will happen during the elections and down the road is anyone's guess.

sweden1975 said...

It is not enough to ask someone of his opinion, who when asked say so and so without any reason. You must explain the underlying scaffolding for your musings.

Sadr never had any war against coalition really, actually he helped (by some methods we don't want to know about). What he wants was his own little state within the state. He is a slow learner, -at last he understand the impossibility of it. He has not only the Americans against him, but EVERYBODY, including the man in the street. If it was only resistance that would be easy -send a suicide bomber now and then, and run the usual rhetoric. But to keep up the with patrolling
men (which must be paid), his own courts and the whole enchilada, no way.

I don't see that this forum has grasped this basic fact. You all talk and behave as if Al Sadr is a partof the resistance in Iraq.