The Most Powerful Man in Iraq?
A friend of Dr. iRack's passed along an interesting McClatchy piece on Brig. Gen. Qassem Suleimani, the commander of the Quds Force, the Iranian paramilitary and espionage organization that has been the focus of much U.S. and Iraqi government attention of late. The story is part of the growing drum beat of Iran stories Dr. iRack has pointed to this week (see here and here). There is clearly a concerted effort underway by the Bush administration (which began during the April Petraeus/Crocker testimony and President Bush's April 10th speech) to prime the media pump and ratchet up the perceived threat posed by Iran's "malign" activities in Iraq (although the truth may be a bit more complicated).
Suleimani has reportedly been the point man for Iranian attempts to calibrate violence in Iraq to serve Tehran's interests, intervening to de-escalate intra-Shia fighting in Basra, while providing lethal assistance to rank-and-file JAM and "special groups" combating U.S. forces in Baghdad.
In other words, Suleimani is a (perhaps the) key player in the the multi-layered chess game Iran is playing in Iraq. And his prominence demonstrates the net increase in Iranian influence in Iraq caused by the war itself:"Whether we like him (Suleimani) or not, whether Americans like him or not, whether Iraqis like him or not, he is the focal point of Iranian policy in Iraq," said a senior Iraqi official who asked not to be identified so he could speak freely. "The Quds Force have played it all, political, military, intelligence, economic. They are Iranian foreign policy in Iraq."
McClatchy reported on March 30 that Suleimani intervened to halt the fighting between mostly Shiite Iraqi security forces and radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al Sadr's Mahdi Army militia in the southern city of Basra. Iraqi officials now confirm that in addition to that meeting, Iraqi President Jalal Talabani personally met Suleimani at a border crossing to make a direct appeal for help. . . .
In Iraq, Iran's chief ally has been the Badr Organization, formerly the paramilitary wing of what's now the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq, the country's largest Shiite political party. During the Iran-Iraq war, Badr operated as a wing of the Iranian military; after the toppling of Saddam, Badr members infiltrated the security forces and were believed to be responsible for torturing and killing jailed Sunnis.
U.S. military officials also charge that Suleimani has brought in Hezbollah fighters to train Iraqi Shiite cells, which the Americans call [JAM] "special groups," that specialize in attacking American forces.
The U.S. officials said that Suleimani's organization is the main source of the EFPs planted by the "special groups" and other Shiite militias.
In other Iran-is-the-greatest-threat-ever news, Marc Lynch over at Abu Aardvark has been reading the Arab press closely (as usual), and he has turned a critical eye toward an increasing volume of charges from Iraqi Awakening groups and Saudi Arabia that Iran is helping AQI. Dr. iRack has no doubt that Iran is playing as many angles as possible, but we should not hype the Iran-AQI link without more "smoking gun" proof than these self-serving allegations. After all, we know what happened the last time we hyped the operational link between a card carring Middle Eastern "axis of evil" member and AQ--it didn't work out so well and created a self-fulfilling prophecy of increased AQ and Iranian influence. Let's try to avoid making that mistake again.Suleimani's role in Iraq illustrates how President Bush's decision to topple Saddam has enabled Shiite, Persian Iran to extend its influence in Iraq, frustrating U.S, aims there, alarming America's Sunni Arab allies in the Persian Gulf and prompting new Israeli fears about Iran's ambitions.
Iraq has become a battleground between Bush's vision of a secular, multiethnic, Western-oriented democracy and the aims of Suleimani and Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, to whom he reports.
8 comments:
Do I smell some cognitive dissonance?
When it comes to blaming Iran for supporting Shia militias and that the Quds Force leadership calling shots the media claims that the military is making up a scape goat to concoct a Casus belli with Iran.
Now we have newspapers blaming the US for allowing greater Iranian influence in Iran?
Which is it? Get your criticisms straight.
Really, how Iran came to be so powerful in Iraq (i.e., due to the war) is quite irrelevant at this point.
The problem with calling this the continuing drumbeat on Iran is that this is McClatchy. Right? Remember? McClatchy. [Yelling now] McClatchy. [no longer yelling]. You can't get any more critical of the administration than McClatchy. I assure you they aren't parroting administration talking points. They would sooner die than to be goons for the administration. I may be infuriated at reading 99% of their articles due to being leftist drivel, but that's the point. At least I know they aren't parroting talking points.
According to the McClatchy article, General Suleimani is the Iranian counterpart to General David Petraeus! They did forget one thing, though. It may very well be that the previous ceasefire Suleimani arranged was not his first for the region. They did use a photo for the piece from Bill Roggio's site. It was a lengthy piece, and a bit sensational. I agree, the drumbeat for an expanded war is getting louder. (Just what the US needs right now, a bigger war.) For its part, Iran is defiant as ever. See for yourself at the english sections of Fars, IRNA or Press TV.
Qassem Suleimani, is he the one that Bunker Cheney comes to visit in the Green Zone to cut the Yalta deal for cooperation before the election (04,06 & 08)? Maybe to assure the plans of Rasputin Rove and heirs are not disrupted? Is he the one who moves the mouth of the Dawa and dances with the other Iaqi stars? Maybe surface a AQI target on occasion? Give a free ride to the favored to and from the airport? (Expanded war? Do we have a secure foot in Iraq to kick from?)
Herschel - Leftist drivel? They've been correct in their reporting more than any other MSM outlet. They didn't gobble the WMD spin of the Administration and they didn't buy the "where is all the good news from Iraq!" BS from 2003-2005.
Your compatriots in the right-wing blogosphere were not as discerning, but that's the difference between "drivel" and genuine journalism. They practice it, you do not.
'Leftist Drivel' means, of course being right. Those Evul Librully biased facts!
-Barry
Let us start to fit the string:
Our allies give mixed messages.
We continue to hold and pay.
Our allies take directions from our enemy.
We continue to hold and pay.
Our enemy gains friends and time.
Our allies give us mixed messages.
We continue to hold and pay.
Our government give us mixed messages.
Our enemy takes victory laps in the Green Zone.
We continue to hold and pay.
runescape money runescape gold tibia item tibia gold runescape accounts tibia money runescape gp buy runescape gold tibia gold tibia item buy runescape money runescape items tibia money
Post a Comment